THE ORLANDO SENTINEL
      Questions Of Status Resurface
      by Ivan Roman
      February 7, 2000 
      Copyright © 2000 THE ORLANDO SENTINEL. All Rights Reserved. 
      SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- The day was
      focused on what would happen in Vieques, but in the governor's
      State of the Commonwealth message last Monday night, the perennial
      status question reared its head. 
      And it kept fighting for attention all
      week. Before he mentioned Vieques, Gov. Pedro Rossello said he
      planned to address the status issue again by the time his second
      term ends Dec. 31. As he kept fending off intense criticism for
      accepting President Clinton's decision, which allows the Navy
      to stay on Vieques for another three years, he also announced
      that plans to solve the 100-year-old status issue would come
      from him and officials in Washington "in the coming weeks." 
      After two plebiscites in 1993 and 1998
      in which less-than-overwhelming support for statehood resulted
      in what Rossello called "frustrating" experiences with
      Congress, he won't insist on another one. He is open to a plebiscite,
      preferably authorized by Congress; a constitutional assembly,
      an idea he rejected in the past; or a presidential commission
      on status, which has been hinted at in Washington recently. 
      The idea is for everyone -- those who
      want statehood, independence or the current Commonwealth status
      with greater autonomy -- to agree on the path toward exploring
      the status definitions and achieving change. Many in the opposition
      have complained that statehooders have forced the island into
      plebiscites against the majority's will, or that a handful of
      congressmen have defined the terms under which independence could
      be granted or the Commonwealth could be changed. 
      "What I would like is for the content
      not to be defined ahead of time and that no procedural route
      is set ahead of time so that everyone feels comfortable with
      the discussion and there is no excuse for not participating,"
      Rossello said. 
      He was referring to what happened in
      the 1998 plebiscite in which the "none of the above"
      option, commonly known as "the fifth column," won,
      boosted mostly by the Popular Democratic Party, which was against
      holding the plebiscite in the first place. Discontent with definitions
      the government placed on the other four status formulas on the
      ballot, critics went to court to get "none of the above"
      on the ballot. 
      That plebiscite was pushed by Rossello
      locally after he failed to get Congress to act. The Young Bill,
      which sought to get Congress to authorize and be bound by a plebiscite,
      squeaked by the House of Representatives by one vote, but it
      stalled in the Senate. The Senate also blocked a bill in time
      for the 1993 plebiscite as divisions about the status formula
      definitions and opposition from English-only and other advocacy
      groups took hold. 
      Rossello and other statehooders have
      realized they have a better chance if they can get everyone to
      agree on how to go about it. The "joint initiative"
      between Rossello's government and Washington, to be announced
      in the next few weeks, should be a first step in that direction,
      he said. 
      To some, the timing seems suspicious. 
      Why now -- at the same time as the controversial
      Vieques decision, suddenly agreed to by Rossello without telling
      anyone? Rep. Anibal Acevedo Vila, PDP vice president, says it's
      a quid pro quo arrangement -- that the White House told  
      Rossello to back Clinton's Vieques decision in exchange for a
      presidential commission to deal with status. To seal the deal
      even more, he said, Rossello got former Gov. Rafael Hernandez
      Colon of the PDP to back the Vieques deal in exchange for a seat
      on that commission. 
      Rossello emphatically denied any quid
      pro quo. Jeffrey Farrow, co-chair of the President's Group on
      Puerto Rico, also denied it and told El Nuevo Dia newspaper
      he was tired of those claims. 
      But the suspicion isn't likely to die
      soon, particularly if a commission is formed and certain people
      are put on it.
      | 
    
      
        
          | 
             Clinton Wants Referendum
            In Puerto Rico On U.S. Relationship 
            February 8, 2000 
            Associated Press Newswires Copyright © 2000 THE ASSOCIATED
            PRESS. 
            All Rights Reserved. 
            SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) - President
            Clinton has asked Congress for $2.5 million to hold another vote
            on whether Puerto Rico should become a U.S. state, the White
            House said Tuesday. 
            The referendum could be held as early
            as October if Congress approves the request, said Jeffrey Farrow,
            Clinton's main adviser on the Caribbean U.S. territory. It was
            included in the White House's fiscal 2001 budget, which was presented
            Monday. 
            Puerto Rico became a U.S. territory
            when the United States wrested it from Spain during the Spanish-American
            War of 1898. Its 3.8 million residents are U.S. citizens but
            cannot vote for president and do not have a vote in Congress. 
            After a U.S. bill ordering a referendum
            died in the Senate, pro- statehood Gov. Pedro Rossello called
            a December 1998 vote asking islanders to choose between U.S.
            statehood , commonwealth, or independence. Supporters of the
            status quo won the vote. 
            Supporters of the current status also
            won a 1993 vote.
            | 
         
        |